It’s a Complex World

People have valid fears regarding nuclear arms. Yet, proponents argue that when powerful nations possess them, it can prevent conflicts with others. Consequently, negotiations with countries like Iran are fraught with tension, and we closely monitor those wielding significant military might.

The era of mutually assured destruction, or MAD, saw humanity channeling vast resources into an arms race while neglecting renewable energy solutions, which could mitigate the impending climate crisis. Today, our predictable human behavior has led to a scenario where the global north inflicts its devastation on the global south. Those who consume the most resources tend to monopolize them, leaving the less fortunate to struggle and perish.

While we lack the mutual destruction aspect, the certainty of destruction remains prevalent.

Guns Versus Nukes

Millions believe that possessing firearms enhances their safety, whereas nuclear materials instill fear. Our collective psychology fosters the belief that nuclear power could be misappropriated to create weapons or that a nuclear facility could be sabotaged. This perspective often overlooks the grim reality: countless individuals die daily due to fossil fuel pollution, environmental disasters, and the social inequalities they exacerbate.

Those in positions of power advocate for firearms—large and small—as tools for maintaining control over those without. Both guns and nuclear arms contribute to a pervasive sense of security that is ultimately illusory.

Demanding Safer Energy

Society should advocate for safe and practical nuclear energy. Historically, even catastrophic events like Chernobyl and Fukushima have resulted in fewer fatalities than coal. We could strive for even safer nuclear options, such as molten salt reactors (MSRs), which eliminate the risk of core meltdown. This presents a more favorable safety profile compared to having a firearm at home, which statistically increases risk.

Our societal narrative often portrays us as heroes capable of thwarting threats, reinforcing this notion through countless forms of media. We mistakenly believe that having a gun offers control, while simultaneously fearing the potential chaos nuclear materials could unleash if mishandled. In the case of firearms, the target is clear; with nuclear energy, the stakes of human error are catastrophic.

Acting on Knowledge, Not Instinct

If we genuinely heed our instincts, we can recognize that our senses often guide us correctly. However, societal conditioning is frequently based on misconceptions. The falsehood persists that we can exploit fossil fuels while enjoying the comforts of modern life. The narrative of being a "good guy" while armed is equally flawed, as is the belief in equitable privilege.

Most individuals fail to see how self-destructive our collective actions truly are. Although psychologists may not specialize in nuclear physics, we understand the human tendencies that lead to these distorted perceptions. While we cannot guarantee the safe management of nuclear waste indefinitely, we can predict human behaviors. Perhaps with the help of AI or robotic systems—less prone to human error—we can transition toward cleaner energy solutions.

However, like a ticking clock, the threat of disaster looms ever closer.