Millions Lack Reliable Home Internet

As of 2019, approximately one-third of households across the nation were without a dependable internet connection. Many families had no choice but to leave their homes for public libraries, schools, or coffee shops to access the internet.

Just a week prior to schools shifting to online learning in 2020, I noticed some students hiding their phones under their desks. When I confronted them, they refused to surrender their devices. For numerous students, school was their only source of internet access. By September 2020, about 3.7 million children still lacked internet connectivity at home.

In August 2020, teachers were instructed to conduct live classes via Zoom. I panicked as my rural home still lacked internet access. I immediately turned to apartments.com, searching for a place with connectivity options. Once the school year commenced, many students struggled to log into Google Classroom or Zoom. Out of the seventy or so students I interacted with every other day, fewer than half managed to log in. Many had never accessed the platform or submitted assignments since school began, leading to widespread failure among teachers and districts nationwide.

The Monopoly of Internet Service Providers

In the U.S., two major companies dominate the internet service landscape: Spectrum (also known as Comcast) and Charter (also known as Xfinity). Rather than competing, these companies divided regions among themselves, allowing them to raise prices and impose data caps. Customers are left with no alternative but to accept their terms.

Approximately 83.3 million people in the U.S. are subject to this internet monopoly, which stifles competition and innovation, particularly in rural areas. Spectrum and Charter see little incentive to extend their services to these regions, as the cost of laying down cables far exceeds the potential revenue from rural customers.

Meanwhile, the so-called competitors provide lackluster services. For instance, ViaSat offers limited data plans—its priciest option provides 150GB for $200 per month. For a family of four or five, where children are often attending Zoom classes, that plan quickly becomes insufficient. In contrast, Spectrum provides unlimited internet at a fraction of the cost, leaving ViaSat and HughesNet, the only options for rural customers, without the motivation to improve their services. With an average speed of 11.7Mbps, ViaSat's connection forces users to watch videos at the lowest settings, often with buffering interruptions.

The Downfall of Google Fiber

Around a decade ago, Google aimed to disrupt the market by becoming an internet service provider, promising to deliver faster speeds through fiber-cable technology. However, as of 2020, Google Fiber was only accessible in twelve cities, leaving many without viable options, including those in rural areas.

Starlink: A Potential Game-Changer

Recently, Elon Musk announced the launch of Starlink, a SpaceX initiative aimed at providing global internet access via satellite technology. To date, SpaceX has deployed over a thousand satellites into low-Earth orbit, with plans to expand that number to over 12,000.

As more satellites are launched, internet coverage will extend worldwide, offering high-speed connectivity for urban, suburban, and rural residents alike. Many users who preordered Starlink have begun receiving their equipment and testing it in remote locations.

Recently, Elon Musk made bold claims regarding Starlink, promising internet speeds of up to 300Mbps and worldwide coverage by the end of 2021. This timeline surpasses Google Fiber, which is limited to a handful of cities. For those lacking internet access or seeking alternatives to Spectrum and Charter, Starlink appears to be a promising solution.

The Challenges Ahead

Despite its potential, Starlink is not yet universally available. Coverage may be slower in urban areas, as satellites can only transmit a limited amount of data to Earth. The service is particularly advantageous for suburban and rural locations with lower population densities.

Additionally, the upfront costs may be prohibitive for some. The satellite and router package costs $499, with a monthly service fee of $99. This pricing may deter low-income families, although it could be worthwhile for those in underserved areas.

If Elon Musk can meet his ambitious timeline and provide global internet access by the end of 2021, he could significantly help students and families currently without internet options. However, the high cost of equipment and service may still prevent many from accessing this technology. If Musk is serious about competing with Spectrum and Charter, reducing prices for the hardware is essential for making it accessible to a broader audience.

For those in rural areas interested in preordering, visit the Starlink website.

Click here for unlimited access to more of my writing and everything else on Medium. Note that this is an affiliate link, and I will receive a portion of your membership fees, which supports my writing!

The second video titled "SpaceX Starlink Review: 2024 Update (vs. Spectrum)" offers insights into Starlink's performance compared to traditional providers, highlighting its advantages in connectivity and speed.